[ { "id": "F001", "title": "The toolchain", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2023-07-26", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/01-tool-landscape.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 33, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Organizes coding-assistance tools by task, interaction style, prompt construction and model or hosting choices. The framework helps separate what a tool does from how a developer supplies its context.", "limitation": "A July 2023 conceptual landscape, not a comparative benchmark or a current product inventory.", "evidence_class": "Conceptual tool taxonomy", "source_locator": "Body: task and interaction categories; prompt composition; models and hosting", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Engineering structure", "streams": [ "T:Engineering structure", "T:Productivity" ], "topics": [ "K:Developer workflow and adoption", "K:Agent context and persistent memory" ], "mapped": [ "C:C01", "C:C03", "C:C09" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F002", "title": "Median - A tale in three functions", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2023-07-27", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/02-median-tale.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 32, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Examines three generated median implementations and the defects or side effects that a knowledgeable developer must recognize. The example makes the choice of test expectations part of the engineering work.", "limitation": "One small TypeScript example; neither defect prevalence nor a general model-quality comparison was established.", "evidence_class": "Worked programming example", "source_locator": "Body: the three median implementations and the test discussion", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Verification & review", "streams": [ "T:Verification & review", "T:Code quality & security" ], "topics": [ "K:Independent verification and oracles", "K:Automation bias and trust" ], "mapped": [ "C:C05", "C:C07", "C:C10" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F003", "title": "In-line assistance - when is it more useful?", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2023-08-01", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/03-coding-assistance-when-useful.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 31, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Discusses when inline suggestions help, considering task familiarity, technology, change size, developer experience and the effort of checking or reworking the output.", "limitation": "Experience-based guidance, largely from experienced developers; usefulness is not a measured universal productivity effect.", "evidence_class": "Practitioner experience", "source_locator": "Body: usefulness factors and review/rework effort", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Productivity", "streams": [ "T:Productivity", "T:Verification & review" ], "topics": [ "K:Developer workflow and adoption", "K:Human cognitive load", "K:Economic costs and return" ], "mapped": [ "C:C02", "C:C03", "C:C10", "C:C12" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [ 2 ], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F004", "title": "In-line assistance - how can it get in the way?", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2023-08-03", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/04-coding-assistance-how-in-the-way.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 30, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Describes assistants repeating poor patterns from their context and the burden of continually judging suggestions. Relates these experiences to automation bias, anchoring and reluctance to discard generated work.", "limitation": "Qualitative examples and interpretive mechanisms, not measured frequencies of bias or review fatigue.", "evidence_class": "Practitioner experience", "source_locator": "Body: reinforcing existing practices; reviewing instead of producing", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Verification & review", "streams": [ "T:Verification & review", "T:System knowledge & memory", "T:Code quality & security" ], "topics": [ "K:Automation bias and trust", "K:Human cognitive load", "K:Agent context and persistent memory" ], "mapped": [ "C:C05", "C:C08", "C:C09" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F005", "title": "Coding assistants do not replace pair programming", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2023-08-10", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/05-not-your-pair-programmer.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 29, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Argues that code assistance does not replace the human knowledge sharing, collaboration and collective understanding associated with pair programming. Tools can instead be used by a human pair.", "limitation": "An argument about the functions of pairing; not a controlled comparison of pairing arrangements.", "evidence_class": "Conceptual argument", "source_locator": "Body: knowledge sharing, team flow and pairing with assistance", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Skills & learning", "streams": [ "T:Skills & learning", "T:Engineering structure", "T:System knowledge & memory" ], "topics": [ "K:Human-agent collaboration", "K:Ownership and knowledge transfer", "K:Skills formation and teaching" ], "mapped": [ "C:C10", "C:C11" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [ 4 ], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F006", "title": "TDD with GitHub Copilot", "authors": [ "Paul Sobocinski" ], "publication_date": "2023-08-17", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/06-tdd-with-coding-assistance.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 28, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Explores assistance during red, green and refactor steps. Human test intent and assertions remain important; suggestions can help implementation while also overproducing code or struggling with refactoring.", "limitation": "Experience with a human-led workflow and an early tool generation; not evidence about fully autonomous TDD or a causal quality gain.", "evidence_class": "Practitioner workflow report", "source_locator": "Body: red, green and refactoring discussions", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Verification & review", "streams": [ "T:Verification & review", "T:Skills & learning" ], "topics": [ "K:Independent verification and oracles", "K:Human-agent collaboration" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C07", "C:C10" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F007", "title": "How is GenAI different from other code generators?", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2023-09-19", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/07-how-is-this-different.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 27, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Contrasts generative assistance with model-driven development and domain-specific code generators. Examines how control and abstraction differ when generation draws on broad learned patterns rather than an explicitly designed transformation.", "limitation": "Conceptual comparison; it does not demonstrate the reliability or economic superiority of either approach.", "evidence_class": "Conceptual argument", "source_locator": "Body: abstraction levels and comparison with traditional generation", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Engineering structure", "streams": [ "T:Engineering structure" ], "topics": [ "K:Specifications and governance", "K:Architecture and modularity" ], "mapped": [ "C:C01", "C:C04", "C:C05" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F008", "title": "How to tackle unreliability of coding assistants", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2023-11-29", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/08-how-to-tackle-unreliability.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 26, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Frames confidence in assistance around feedback, the developer’s ability to check an answer and the consequences of error. Proposes timeboxing unproductive assistance and retaining responsibility for the result.", "limitation": "Personal heuristics rather than calibrated reliability estimates; informal numerical intuitions are not treated as measured rates.", "evidence_class": "Practitioner guidance", "source_locator": "Body: confidence, timeboxing and assistant persona", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Verification & review", "streams": [ "T:Verification & review", "T:What agents can do" ], "topics": [ "K:Agent failure and escalation", "K:Independent verification and oracles", "K:Automation bias and trust" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C07", "C:C08", "C:C13" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [ 2 ], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F009", "title": "Onboarding to a 'legacy' codebase with the help of AI", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2024-08-15", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/09-ai-help-onboarding-codebase.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 25, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Recounts work on an unfamiliar Bahmni/OpenMRS issue. AI helped with terminology and code navigation, but environment setup, fixtures and mocking remained obstacles, and the issue was not solved in the attempt.", "limitation": "One exploratory onboarding attempt; no measured reduction in onboarding time or demonstrated long-term comprehension.", "evidence_class": "Exploratory case report", "source_locator": "Body: issue exploration, code search, environment and testing attempts", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:System knowledge & memory", "streams": [ "T:System knowledge & memory", "T:Skills & learning" ], "topics": [ "K:Onboarding and developer fluency", "K:System understanding and rationale" ], "mapped": [ "C:C05", "C:C09", "C:C10" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F010", "title": "Building an AI agent application to migrate a tech stack", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2024-08-20", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/10-ai-for-tech-stack-migration.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 24, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Builds a tool-using agent to migrate tests from Enzyme to React Testing Library. The account exposes file-editing, test-feedback and context-management problems alongside successful transformations.", "limitation": "A bounded migration experiment with substantial failures; not proof of reliable autonomous migration across a codebase.", "evidence_class": "Exploratory implementation experiment", "source_locator": "Body: manually solved baseline, agent setup and migration observations", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:What agents can do", "streams": [ "T:What agents can do", "T:Code quality & security", "T:System knowledge & memory" ], "topics": [ "K:Agent failure and escalation", "K:Long-running agent execution", "K:Independent verification and oracles" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C05", "C:C07", "C:C09" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F011", "title": "Expanding the solution size with multi-file editing", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2024-11-19", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/11-multi-file-editing.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 23, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Examines how multi-file edits enlarge the unit of AI-assisted work. Larger suggestions create new checking demands, including unrelated changes, and motivate layered feedback and comprehensible module boundaries.", "limitation": "A tool-use snapshot and qualitative experience; no comparative defect rate or current feature guarantee.", "evidence_class": "Practitioner tool exploration", "source_locator": "Body: multi-file mode, feedback loops and implications of larger changes", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Code quality & security", "streams": [ "T:Code quality & security", "T:Verification & review", "T:What agents can do" ], "topics": [ "K:Architecture and modularity", "K:Review capacity and maintainers", "K:Developer workflow and adoption" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C05", "C:C08" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F012", "title": "What role does LLM reasoning play for software tasks?", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2025-02-18", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/12-role-of-reasoning.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 22, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Questions where model reasoning adds value to coding tasks compared with supplying repository context and useful tool feedback. Considers debugging and planning as possible settings for investigation.", "limitation": "Tentative analysis from February 2025, not a current model-feature comparison or evidence that reasoning always helps or harms coding.", "evidence_class": "Conceptual analysis", "source_locator": "Body: reasoning models, software tasks and contextual/tool feedback", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:What agents can do", "streams": [ "T:What agents can do", "T:System knowledge & memory" ], "topics": [ "K:Evaluation methodology and baselines", "K:Agent context and persistent memory" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C09" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F013", "title": "The role of developer skills in agentic coding", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2025-03-25", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/13-role-of-developer-skills.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 21, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Uses agent missteps to explain why decomposition, debugging, design judgment and checking remain valuable. Separates immediate completion from team iteration and the lifetime of the codebase.", "limitation": "Experience-based examples, not a measured skills intervention or a forecast of developer employment.", "evidence_class": "Practitioner analysis", "source_locator": "Body: missteps and the time-to-commit, iteration and codebase-lifetime perspectives", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Skills & learning", "streams": [ "T:Skills & learning", "T:Code quality & security", "T:Engineering structure" ], "topics": [ "K:Skills formation and teaching", "K:Technical debt and complexity", "K:Human-agent collaboration" ], "mapped": [ "C:C01", "C:C05", "C:C10", "C:C11" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F014", "title": "Guiding an LLM for Robust Java ByteBuffer Code", "authors": [ "Unmesh Joshi" ], "publication_date": "2025-04-17", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/14-guiding-llm-java-bytebuffer.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 20, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Follows a developer–LLM dialogue about Java ByteBuffer header access. The engineer uncovers problems with mutable buffer position and guides the design toward clearer access and encapsulation.", "limitation": "An illustrative dialogue; removing position mutation does not by itself establish thread safety or general performance.", "evidence_class": "Worked programming example", "source_locator": "Body: header reading, position side effects and absolute access", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Code quality & security", "streams": [ "T:Code quality & security", "T:Verification & review" ], "topics": [ "K:Architecture and modularity", "K:Independent verification and oracles", "K:System understanding and rationale" ], "mapped": [ "C:C05", "C:C07", "C:C10" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F015", "title": "Building TMT Mirror Visualization with LLM: A Step-by-Step Journey", "authors": [ "Unmesh Joshi" ], "publication_date": "2025-04-30", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/15-building-tmt-mirror-visualization.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 19, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Describes building a telescope-mirror visualization with unfamiliar tools. Small geometric steps, visual checks and domain knowledge guide successive changes while the developer learns the implementation approach.", "limitation": "A personal prototype-building account; neither retained learning nor broader productivity was evaluated.", "evidence_class": "Exploratory learning case", "source_locator": "Body: initial visualization, hexagon geometry and iterative refinement", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Skills & learning", "streams": [ "T:Skills & learning", "T:What agents can do" ], "topics": [ "K:Skills formation and teaching", "K:Human-agent collaboration", "K:Developer workflow and adoption" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C04", "C:C10" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F016", "title": "Coding Assistants Threaten the Software Supply Chain", "authors": [ "Jim Gumbley", "Lilly Ryan" ], "publication_date": "2025-05-13", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/software-supply-chain-attack-surface.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 18, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Analyzes the attack surface created when coding assistants consume project instructions and invoke tools with developer privileges. Discusses poisoned context, dependency risks and boundaries around execution.", "limitation": "Security analysis rather than an attack-incidence study. Protocol and tool details belong to the May 2025 publication context.", "evidence_class": "Threat analysis", "source_locator": "Body: assistant inputs, tools, supply-chain exposure and defenses", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Code quality & security", "streams": [ "T:Code quality & security", "T:Engineering structure" ], "topics": [ "K:Prompt injection and malicious tools", "K:Dependencies and agent supply chain" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C06" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F017", "title": "Building Custom Tooling with LLMs", "authors": [ "Unmesh Joshi" ], "publication_date": "2025-05-14", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/16-building-custom-tooling-with-llms.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 17, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Recounts extending PlantUML with custom visualization tooling. The developer uses generation and feedback to build the tool, while shaping abstractions and keeping the resulting code understandable and maintainable.", "limitation": "One custom-tooling case; lower perceived effort is not a controlled productivity estimate.", "evidence_class": "Practitioner implementation case", "source_locator": "Body: PlantUML extension, implementation iterations and code habitability", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Code quality & security", "streams": [ "T:Code quality & security", "T:Productivity", "T:System knowledge & memory" ], "topics": [ "K:Architecture and modularity", "K:System understanding and rationale", "K:Developer workflow and adoption" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C05", "C:C09", "C:C10" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F018", "title": "Autonomous coding agents: A Codex example", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2025-06-04", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/autonomous-agents-codex-example.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 16, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Inspects a background agent making a small Haiven change. The execution trace reveals code-search behavior, missing executable checks and inconsistent reuse across attempts, distinguishing unattended execution from accepted work.", "limitation": "A small dated tool experiment; not a model ranking or a general estimate of autonomous success.", "evidence_class": "Exploratory agent case", "source_locator": "Body: supervised/background distinction, task trace and repeated attempts", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:What agents can do", "streams": [ "T:What agents can do", "T:Verification & review" ], "topics": [ "K:Agent failure and escalation", "K:Code reuse and duplication", "K:Independent verification and oracles" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C05", "C:C07", "C:C09" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F019", "title": "I still care about the code", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2025-07-09", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/i-still-care-about-the-code.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 15, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Argues that responsibility for operational software still requires understanding code and its risks. Contrasts probabilistic generation with designed language translation and relates oversight to possible error consequences.", "limitation": "A professional position, not a calibrated threshold for how much review every change requires.", "evidence_class": "Conceptual argument", "source_locator": "Body: operational responsibility and comparison with compilers", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Verification & review", "streams": [ "T:Verification & review", "T:Code quality & security" ], "topics": [ "K:Automation bias and trust", "K:System understanding and rationale", "K:Ownership and knowledge transfer" ], "mapped": [ "C:C01", "C:C05", "C:C08", "C:C13" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [ 7 ], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F020", "title": "Partner with the AI, throw away the code", "authors": [ "Matteo Vaccari" ], "publication_date": "2025-07-31", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/partner-with-ai-and-throw-away-the-code.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 14, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "In a Go/MySQL performance investigation, generated helpers, experiments and unsuccessful rewrites helped the developer understand the problem before rewriting the core solution. Useful assistance can therefore leave little accepted generated code.", "limitation": "A single client case; code-acceptance rate is questioned, but a general AI-caused productivity gain is not measured.", "evidence_class": "Practitioner case report", "source_locator": "Body: diagnosis, experiments, discarded proposals and final rewrite", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Productivity", "streams": [ "T:Productivity", "T:Skills & learning", "T:Economics" ], "topics": [ "K:Output versus shipped value", "K:Evaluation methodology and baselines", "K:System understanding and rationale" ], "mapped": [ "C:C02", "C:C05", "C:C10", "C:C12" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F021", "title": "To vibe or not to vibe", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2025-09-23", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/to-vibe-or-not-vibe.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 13, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Describes decisions about oversight using the chance of an error, its impact and the ability to detect it. The examples favor situation-dependent attention over a single rule for all generated code.", "limitation": "A qualitative risk heuristic and personal experience; not a statistically calibrated risk model.", "evidence_class": "Practitioner decision heuristic", "source_locator": "Body: risk factors and situational review decisions", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Verification & review", "streams": [ "T:Verification & review", "T:Engineering structure" ], "topics": [ "K:Automation bias and trust", "K:Human-agent collaboration" ], "mapped": [ "C:C01", "C:C08", "C:C13" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F022", "title": "Anchoring AI to a reference application", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2025-09-25", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/anchoring-to-reference.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 12, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Explores using a runnable reference application to guide changes across services. A scoped comparison and a reviewed change report precede implementation, raising a choice between AI-based propagation and deterministic transformations.", "limitation": "A small reference-update example; consistency and maintainability at organizational scale remain untested.", "evidence_class": "Exploratory workflow example", "source_locator": "Body: reference application, differences, report and update workflow", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:System knowledge & memory", "streams": [ "T:System knowledge & memory", "T:Code quality & security", "T:Engineering structure" ], "topics": [ "K:Architecture and modularity", "K:Agent context and persistent memory", "K:Specifications and governance" ], "mapped": [ "C:C04", "C:C05", "C:C09" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F023", "title": "Understanding Spec-Driven-Development: Kiro, spec-kit, and Tessl", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2025-10-15", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/sdd-3-tools.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 11, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Distinguishes spec-first, spec-anchored and spec-as-source approaches through three tool explorations. Examines persistent specifications, task sizing, brownfield fit, instruction following and documentation overhead.", "limitation": "A dated exploratory comparison, not controlled evidence for SDD effectiveness. The author’s questions about specification overhead and source-of-truth claims are retained.", "evidence_class": "Practitioner comparative exploration", "source_locator": "Body: definitions of SDD; Kiro, spec-kit and Tessl explorations; reflections", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Engineering structure", "streams": [ "T:Engineering structure", "T:System knowledge & memory" ], "topics": [ "K:Specifications and governance", "K:Developer workflow and adoption", "K:Agent context and persistent memory" ], "mapped": [ "C:C04", "C:C09", "C:C11", "C:C13" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [ 18 ], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F024", "title": "Assessing internal quality while coding with an agent", "authors": [ "Erik Doernenburg" ], "publication_date": "2026-01-27", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/ccmenu-quality.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 10, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Uses a CCMenu feature change to inspect internal quality. A fix that compiles can still erode the intended type model, introduce duplication or add unnecessary mechanisms; expert examination exposes those differences.", "limitation": "The author presents an anecdote, not a study; observations do not establish a population-level quality effect.", "evidence_class": "Practitioner code-review case", "source_locator": "Body: GitLab support, optional values, duplication and cache behavior", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Code quality & security", "streams": [ "T:Code quality & security", "T:Verification & review" ], "topics": [ "K:Technical debt and complexity", "K:Code reuse and duplication", "K:Architecture and modularity" ], "mapped": [ "C:C05", "C:C07", "C:C08" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F025", "title": "Context Engineering for Coding Agents", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2026-02-05", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/context-engineering-coding-agents.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 9, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Organizes context features by who invokes them: a person, the model or agent software. Discusses rules, skills, subagents, external context and hooks as parts of the developer experience.", "limitation": "Feature and practice snapshot, not proof of effectiveness or enforcement. Adding more configuration can produce contradictions or an illusion of control.", "evidence_class": "Practitioner technical taxonomy", "source_locator": "Body: trigger-based feature overview and context configuration", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:System knowledge & memory", "streams": [ "T:System knowledge & memory", "T:Engineering structure" ], "topics": [ "K:Agent context and persistent memory", "K:Developer workflow and adoption", "K:Specifications and governance" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C09", "C:C13" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F026", "title": "Harness Engineering - first thoughts", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2026-02-17", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/harness-engineering-memo.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 8, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Interprets a reported harness through context, architectural constraints and codebase maintenance. Raises questions about reusable harnesses, constrained topologies and the effort of retrofitting existing systems.", "limitation": "A reaction to another organization’s account, not an independent experiment. The author explicitly notes a gap in the reported functional verification.", "evidence_class": "Interpretive practitioner commentary", "source_locator": "Body: three categories; templates; runtime constraints; brownfield retrofit; final thoughts", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Engineering structure", "streams": [ "T:Engineering structure", "T:Code quality & security" ], "topics": [ "K:Architecture and modularity", "K:Independent verification and oracles", "K:Long-running agent execution" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C05", "C:C07", "C:C11", "C:C13" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F027", "title": "Humans and Agents in Software Engineering Loops", "authors": [ "Kief Morris" ], "publication_date": "2026-03-04", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/humans-and-agents.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 7, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Distinguishes the why loop that pursues outcomes from nested how loops that build software. Proposes human work on the loop: improving guidance, checks and workflow rather than only editing individual outputs.", "limitation": "A conceptual operating model. Its proposed agentic improvement flywheel is not a demonstrated organizational or reliability result.", "evidence_class": "Conceptual operating model", "source_locator": "Body: why/how loops; humans outside, in and on the loop; flywheel", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Engineering structure", "streams": [ "T:Engineering structure", "T:Jobs & roles" ], "topics": [ "K:Human-agent collaboration", "K:Long-running agent execution", "K:Specifications and governance" ], "mapped": [ "C:C01", "C:C03", "C:C11", "C:C13" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F028", "title": "Viability of local models for coding", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2026-07-07", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/local-models-for-coding-factors.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 6, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Frames local agentic coding as a combined hardware, model, runtime, context and tool-calling problem. The account separates being able to run a model from obtaining usable results.", "limitation": "A personal hardware/tool snapshot. Explanations for observed configuration differences are hypotheses; code quality was not systematically evaluated.", "evidence_class": "Practitioner configuration exploration", "source_locator": "Scope; factors influencing viability; context size and harness; conclusions", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:What agents can do", "streams": [ "T:What agents can do", "T:Economics", "T:System knowledge & memory" ], "topics": [ "K:Agent context and persistent memory", "K:Economic costs and return", "K:Evaluation methodology and baselines" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C09", "C:C12" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [ 29 ], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F029", "title": "Experiences with local models for coding", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2026-07-08", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/local-models-for-coding-experiences.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 5, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Presents a viability funnel and compares manual trials, a small automated evaluation and everyday local-model use. Outcome sensitivity to task, context and configuration makes simple capability claims difficult.", "limitation": "Two principal JavaScript/TypeScript tasks and small uneven repeat counts; one-shot automated trials differ from interactive work and do not establish a general ranking.", "evidence_class": "Exploratory task evaluation", "source_locator": "Viability funnel; two task descriptions; manual/automated phases; day-to-day use", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:What agents can do", "streams": [ "T:What agents can do", "T:Productivity", "T:System knowledge & memory" ], "topics": [ "K:Benchmarks and construct validity", "K:Evaluation methodology and baselines", "K:Agent context and persistent memory" ], "mapped": [ "C:C02", "C:C03", "C:C09", "C:C12" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [ 28, 11 ], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F030", "title": "The Economic Benefit of Refactoring", "authors": [ "Giles Edwards-Alexander" ], "publication_date": "2026-07-30", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/refactoring-economic-benefit.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 4, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Repeats one representative change as a large Rust data-access module is refactored. Estimated input-token use falls after decomposition permits more selective code reading, connecting architecture to inference work.", "limitation": "One application and change, approximate token counting and incomplete refactoring-cost accounting; this does not establish general ROI or savings for every future task.", "evidence_class": "Exploratory refactoring experiment", "source_locator": "Experiment in refactoring; results table; notes on process; further work", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Economics", "streams": [ "T:Economics", "T:Code quality & security" ], "topics": [ "K:Economic costs and return", "K:Architecture and modularity", "K:Code reuse and duplication" ], "mapped": [ "C:C02", "C:C05", "C:C12" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F031", "title": "TDD inside the agent loop - theater or actual value?", "authors": [ "Birgitta Böckeler" ], "publication_date": "2026-08-10", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/tdd-in-the-agent-loop.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 3, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Separates human-authored tests, a human review checkpoint and TDD entirely inside an agent loop. The small exploratory comparison found no clear advantage for fully internal TDD in model-judged quality or mutation scores.", "limitation": "Small greenfield tasks, imperfect adherence and an LLM-defined quality rubric. Reported aggregate tokens include cache rereads and are not equivalent to billed cost; no universal conclusion about human-led TDD follows.", "evidence_class": "Small exploratory agent evaluation", "source_locator": "Setup; results; test-first and red-green goals; costs; conclusions", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Verification & review", "streams": [ "T:Verification & review", "T:Economics" ], "topics": [ "K:Independent verification and oracles", "K:Evaluation methodology and baselines", "K:Economic costs and return" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C07", "C:C12", "C:C13" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [ 30 ], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F032", "title": "An Accidental Blackboard", "authors": [ "Giles Edwards-Alexander" ], "publication_date": "2026-09-02", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai/an-accidental-blackboard.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 2, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "In a simulated airline exercise, shared plans and frequent repository updates became an improvised coordination surface for agents. The account connects this behavior with the blackboard pattern and describes resulting CI pressure.", "limitation": "A practice exercise, not a deployed airline system. The author explicitly questions reproducibility; the coordination mechanism was emergent rather than experimentally isolated.", "evidence_class": "Exploratory team exercise", "source_locator": "Emergent behavior; shared plans; repository as blackboard; CI trade-off", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Engineering structure", "streams": [ "T:Engineering structure", "T:System knowledge & memory" ], "topics": [ "K:Human-agent collaboration", "K:Agent context and persistent memory", "K:Long-running agent execution" ], "mapped": [ "C:C03", "C:C09", "C:C11" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false }, { "id": "F033", "title": "Are Harnesses Worth the Cost?", "authors": [ "Naresh Jain" ], "publication_date": "2026-10-13", "url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/are-harnesses-worth-the-cost.html", "series": "Exploring Generative AI", "publisher": "martinfowler.com", "hub_url": "https://martinfowler.com/articles/exploring-gen-ai.html", "hub_order": 1, "accessed_on": "2026-10-13", "date_provenance": "Dated entry on the supplied series index; article date also used where printed", "summary": "Compares development with and without a behavioral harness against a separate acceptance suite. On the selected service, the stronger model passed both conditions; a cost-optimized model passed more consistently with harness feedback, at greater per-attempt effort.", "limitation": "Ten paired runs per model on one unusually detailed greenfield Java brief. Guides and sensors changed together; estimated generation costs omit harness authoring, review and repairs. Final-gate-only use is proposed, not tested.", "evidence_class": "Small repeated-run implementation experiment", "source_locator": "Experiment setup; independent outer evaluation; model comparisons; economics; boundaries", "verification_scope": "Primary article byline and selected body passages inspected; no independent execution or statistical replication", "primary_stream": "T:Economics", "streams": [ "T:Economics", "T:Verification & review", "T:Engineering structure" ], "topics": [ "K:Economic costs and return", "K:Independent verification and oracles", "K:Specifications and governance" ], "mapped": [ "C:C02", "C:C03", "C:C04", "C:C07", "C:C12", "C:C13" ], "actual": [], "printed": false, "body_links": [ 30 ], "mapping_status": "Independent editorial mapping, not classification by the article authors or SE@PoliMi", "book_citation_status": "NOT_ADDED_TO_BOOK", "original_data_replicated": false } ]